{"id":927,"date":"2013-12-05T23:44:26","date_gmt":"2013-12-06T06:44:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/?p=927"},"modified":"2013-12-05T23:44:27","modified_gmt":"2013-12-06T06:44:27","slug":"optics-and-pragmatics-the-politics-of-design","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/?p=927","title":{"rendered":"Optics and pragmatics: The politics of design"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the toughest lessons I&#8217;ve been learning as a corporate design leader is the political nature of designing, in terms of the actual activity of shaping a novel form or behavior that overthrows an existing model. Hey, it&#8217;s some scary stuff for people used to doing things a certain way :-)\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>First let me clarify. By <em>politics<\/em>, I don&#8217;t mean long knives sneakily sharpened by duplicitous faux allies. I&#8217;m instead referring to the constant argumentation over resources and priorities and agendas&#8211;which is a conversational ebb and flow, resting on shifting subtleties of flawed personalities, not deftly wicked impulses. There is a factual limit to the number of hours, people, funds, tools, and so forth that can be committed to a design endeavor. And dutifully, such people in charge of this resourcing seek purposeful, transactionally sound, pragmatic resolution, a balance of aims to achieve satisfying compromise for everyone involved. However, the same folks want to selfishly claim their objective outright for their own benefit&#8211;it&#8217;s only human!\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>To truly design something is to deliver an outcome that is feasible and desirable, satisfying a range of contingencies and constraints, not some theoretical vision exercise&#8211;this is &#8220;The Real World&#8221; ;-) And this requires dealing with various people who are concerned about risks and tradeoffs and availability of resources, massaging the message, nuancing the details, persuasive campaigning, etc. It&#8217;s the art of politics, plain and simple&#8211;via diplomacy and negotiated compromise, while preserving your principles and convictions. Not easy!<\/p>\n<p>To complicate things further, you must hold a vigilant outlook for the <em>optics<\/em> of a situation, how does it appear to the other stakeholders (whether internal business owners or external vendors\/clients) in working out the politics. How does it look for you and your team against your client or other departments\/teams? Perception is reality for people, as a general axiom. And shaping that perception can affect your negotiating position towards effective results. Again, it&#8217;s not underhanded or duplicitous in intention, simply having extra diligence for the flawed human natures at work&#8211;because, as a lot we&#8217;re greedy, egotistical, temperamental, judgy, and needy, in varying degrees, of course ;-) How does it look for the PM to have to make a hard call without data from the User Researcher, or when creating a next-gen prototype that Engineering is having difficulties building out, will that erode your position, cause colleagues to feel embarrassed or less willing to support you? How can you work out a balance of practical issues while supporting perceptual &amp; emotional matters accordingly, so you reach that win-win position? Hmm.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no easy answers but paying attention to the pragmatics and optics of working with other people when delivering a design (i.e.,politics) is essential to leadership success.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the toughest lessons I&#8217;ve been learning as a corporate design leader is the political nature of designing, in terms of the actual activity of shaping a novel form or behavior that overthrows an existing model. Hey, it&#8217;s some scary stuff for people used to doing things a certain way :-)\u00c2\u00a0 First let me &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/?p=927\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Optics and pragmatics: The politics of design&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general-stuff"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=927"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":928,"href":"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927\/revisions\/928"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ghostinthepixel.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}